Following more than 200 interviews and exhaustive scrutiny of his digital footprint, federal investigators have begun to sketch a portrait of Thomas Matthew Crooks, the man who targeted former President Donald Trump. Initial findings suggest Crooks, a registered Republican, intelligent but reclusive individual with a keen interest in firearms, may not have been driven by overt political motives.

Authorities remain perplexed about Crooks’ exact intentions, speculating that his alleged assassination attempt may have been more about targeting a high-profile figure in close proximity rather than a political statement. Sources reveal Crooks had researched both Trump and President Joe Biden, and had information on prominent figures from both parties stored on his phone. He also searched for the location of Trump’s rally as well as the upcoming Democratic National Convention, according to investigators who spoke with CNN.

Adding to the intrigue, Crooks’ final search on his cell phone before the attempt on Trump’s life was for pornography, a senior law enforcement source told The Daily Beast.

Analysts draw comparisons to past cases like the Las Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock, emphasizing the challenge of understanding the motivations of solitary attackers who often leave few clues. Despite possessing an improvised explosive device, which raises questions about his broader plans, Crooks appeared to have primarily targeted Trump himself rather than aiming to cause mass casualties.

“Even though he didn’t get his primary target, the shooter was successful in a lot of ways because he got closer to doing something no one has done in decades,” remarked one federal official to CNN, referring to the attempt on a presidential figure.

Mary Ellen O’Toole, a former FBI profiler, said that based on the evidence assembled so far, she thought that Trump’s rally was “very appealing” to Crooks in part because it “fell in his backyard.”

“This gave him incredible attention and catapulted him to a point where I think that’s why he chose this,” she told CNN.

However, the puzzle deepens with scant evidence of political motive or a manifesto. Experts caution against oversimplifying Crooks’ motives, emphasizing the complexities of lone offenders who evade detection until their moment of action.

Kathleen Puckett, a former FBI analyst, observed that Crooks’ limited weaponry and planning indicated he may have exploited a perceived opportunity rather than planning a large-scale assault.

“Whatever his story turns out to be, it’s not going to be simplistic, I don’t think – it’s going to be more complicated,” Puckett said. “You don’t want the simplistic version. You want every detail you can find.”

“Whatever unfolds, the narrative won’t be straightforward,” she added. “We need to grasp every facet before forming conclusions.”